Air Purifier Review – Efficacy & Efficiency Tests

To combat invisible contaminants in the air, air doctor purifiers are available. These purifiers use beneficial reactive agents that are invisible to the user. How can a user tell if the purifier is actually burning electricity or if it’s doing what it says? An honest review is a good place to begin. The safety of users is the first step in a quality review. This author has written 2 articles on EzineArticles.com about safety.

Air Doctor | New Japanese Technology

Air doctor purifier review should also contain 2 other equally important criteria.

(1) Efficacy Test – The purifier technology must be tested in a laboratory to prove its effectiveness.

(2) Efficiency Test – The purifier technology must pass a lab test before it can be successfully transferred into an appliance that reproduces the laboratory results at the user’s home, school or work place. These tests are extremely difficult and require significant resources beyond the capabilities of ordinary users. The Efficacy test must be performed by a laboratory, and only then by a GLP-certified lab.

GLP is an acronym for Good Laboratory Practice. It was developed by the OECD in order to guarantee the production of reliable and high-quality test data. It is difficult to conduct the Efficiency Test in a consistent and objective manner because it must be done at user locations. These obstacles aside, an air doctor purifier review must include a thorough assessment of the purifier’s efficacy. These characteristics are important to test properly.

(1) A controlled experiment

This involves rigorous testing of a unproven statement, known as a hypothesis.

This concise summary of the science behind technology is clear and concise.

Control check – The effects of an air doctor  purifier operating in a room should be compared to the effects of a purifier not present.

Replication – The experiment must be peer reviewed, preferably by an independent third party.

Replication: The experiment must produce the same results at all times, provided that the conditions are the same.

Replication – Different purifiers from the same model must give very similar or identical results.

(2) Randomized double blind testing standard. This is the highest standard in medical clinical testing. The researcher and test subject are unable to tell if they are in the actual experiment (where an air doctor purifier is working) or the control experiment.

(3) The proper testing site – This is where all variables that could affect the performance and effectiveness of a purifier are controlled, e.g. Room size, temperature, humidity and inclusion or exclusion from ambient or outdoor air are all factors that can affect the performance of a purifier.

(4) Accurate measurements, recording – The effectiveness of purifiers can vary depending on distance, air flow speeds and consistency of instrumentation. ;

(5) Use of specialized measuring equipment (images at The air doctor Purifier blog) is often required.

microbiological air sampler

ozone tester

positive & negative ion detector

decibel meter.

(6) The ability to use proper analytical tools and skills to accurately measure and record the results of the experiments before and after they are performed. Analyzing mold cultures before and during air doctor purification

(7) It is crucial that the testing staff are honest in order to ensure reliable and professional documentation. The results of the effectiveness and efficacy tests can be very useful inputs for an air doctor purifier review if they have been done on purifiers by GLP-certified laboratories. This blog is dedicated to obtaining such data from as many purifiers and purifiers as possible in order to produce objective, reliable air doctor Reviews that are useful for all users.

Be the first to reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *